Steven Garrity has a nice little three part series on why open formats aren't popular, and why they are having problems getting adopted.
The Catch-22 of Open Format Adoption,
Part 1: Music
Part 2: Instant Messaging
Part 3: Office Documents
My thoughts on Part 1: Music
He does make a very good point about how people associate mp3 with free, when it actually is not. Lame (Lame Ain't an Mp3 Encoder) is the most popular mp3 encoder, used by about 99% of the music ripping underground. It is, however, technically illegal. There are patents held by Motion Pictures Experts Groups (MPEG) members, and these members require licensing fees to use mpeg 1 layer 3 (mp3) technologies. Should the FBI and the courts in the States (and any other country that has patentable software) start cracking down and actually start enforcing the law, then people who rip music would have to start using Nero, Adobe, or some other encoder that must be paid for. For the record, the open source Lame is also orders of magnitude better than the reference encoders, so don't think that paying for the encoders will get you better quality; forcing Lame out of the equation will actually reduce quality of rips. The same thing goes for XviD. Despite being open source, it is still covered by patents, and is illegal to distribute in compiled form (I don't know where Koepi and Nic live, but should they be in the States, they are breaking the law for providing us with an excellent video encoder in binary format). Steven pretty much hits the nail on the head as to why Vorbis hasn't been adopted, although I believe that Winamp comes with Vorbis support out of the box.
Part 2: Instant Messaging
My brother, who is in middle school, recieved his year book today. The theme: Mount Slesse Messenger (a play between the school's name, Mount Slesse Middle School (MSMS), and Microsoft Network Messenger (MSN Messenger)) The front of the year book says "welcome msm" at the top. In the center is a little green blob man, just like that little green MS guy, wearing a muscle shirt with the school logo. Beside the guy is a button that says "Sign In .net", with the exact same colour scheme, font, and format as the MSN Sign In button. The entire year book is done up to look like MSN Messenger, with just enough changes to prevent copyright or trademark legal action from MS Canada. I also went to the school's year end assembly (to film my brother playing in rock club), and saw the unveiling of the year book. To initiate the unveiling, the student said, "what do we use almost every day?" Within a split second a girl from the back screamed "MSN!" This is very interesting to me as a person familiar with the Internet. MSN quite literally stands for 'Microsoft Network". It started off as an ISP that MS was using to gain market share from AOL. It has since extended to a set of services offered online by MS, from the ISP to the web portal "msn.com" to the MSN Messenger program. To a 15 year old girl, however, MSN has no connotations to a service provider. It doesn't represent a news site or a web search (Google for that one probably). For 15 year old kids in Western Canada, MSN has it's own urban dictionary definition of "gossiping with friends when you should be doing homework." Those three letters mean simply that, and the kids don't care about openness, or what company provides it, or how Yahoo! is more popular in another part of the country, and AOL IM is popular in another place, while SMS is the thing in Europe and Asia. Changing protocols would be very difficult because practically everyone here uses MSN. As Steven says in his article, you can use a multi-protocol client, such as Gaim. I use Gaim to log in as both "javaman1138@hotmail.com" and "tiosc@jabber.com". You can also view in Jeff Waugh's Project Topaz presentation from Guadec how he really got a girl interested when he said that Gaim can support MSN and Yahoo! and AOL all in one window, and all on Windows. Despite the capabilities of Gaim and Trillian to use multiple protocols, it is unlikely that there will be a massive migration. I have yet to meet another person using Jabber.
Part 3: Office Documents
Here is one closed format that I can't figure out how it became so popular. Winamp and MSN Messenger may be free, but when someone sends you a MS Word .doc file in an email, you need to run out and spend $400 at a computer retailer. Even with Dell and other OEMs selling reduced price boxes with a new system, how is it that everybody ended up having this expensive piece of software? Is pirating more prevalent than I thought? I'm not saying that OpenOffice should have been more popular, but why did people spend so much money on Office when there is a perfectly crappy piece of MS software called "Wordpad" that comes with every Windows box? What and when exactly was Corel WordPerfect killed off? I mean, MS Office is $399, while Corel's Office is "only" $299. Since when did people enjoy paying $100 more for an office suite? Why don't the kids use the bundled Wordpad like they do the bundled Media Player and bundled Internet Explorer? Could OpenOffice take over with its low low price of only $0?
My mom has to make changes to the school's parent advisory council constitution. This file was created in MS Word in 1997, and has not been edited since. When I save the file, I plan on saving the revised file in OpenOffice 2.0's OASIS .odt format, OpenOffice's MS Word .doc export filters, PDF, and HTML, with a text file explaining why there are all the formats. I wouldn't expect another edit to be made for another seven years, and I want to make sure that the file is still readable the next time that should happen. I rip my audio CDs in Vorbis and try to do everything in an open-source patent-free way, but I know not many do, and it is I who will have to adapt when someone sends me an email with an attachment.